<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Judicial Restraint?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://politics.ohio.com/2008/11/09/judicial-restraint/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://politics.ohio.com/2008/11/09/judicial-restraint/</link>
	<description>Ohio Politcal News, Commentary and Information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 22:07:38 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chuck</title>
		<link>http://politics.ohio.com/2008/11/09/judicial-restraint/comment-page-1/#comment-6808</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 21:42:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politics.ohio.com/?p=3339#comment-6808</guid>
		<description>They can go ahead and block a few lower court judges, like happened w/ Bush</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They can go ahead and block a few lower court judges, like happened w/ Bush</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Keeler</title>
		<link>http://politics.ohio.com/2008/11/09/judicial-restraint/comment-page-1/#comment-6807</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Keeler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 21:03:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politics.ohio.com/?p=3339#comment-6807</guid>
		<description>I am not for going against SC nominees, though I should be.  Republicans just dont do that, despite the horrible treatment our nominees got.  Even after Bork and Thomas, Republicans still voted overwhelmingly for Ginsberg and Breyer because they were qualified.  That is the ultimate prize of winning the White House.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not for going against SC nominees, though I should be.  Republicans just dont do that, despite the horrible treatment our nominees got.  Even after Bork and Thomas, Republicans still voted overwhelmingly for Ginsberg and Breyer because they were qualified.  That is the ultimate prize of winning the White House.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PowerLaser</title>
		<link>http://politics.ohio.com/2008/11/09/judicial-restraint/comment-page-1/#comment-6806</link>
		<dc:creator>PowerLaser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 19:25:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politics.ohio.com/?p=3339#comment-6806</guid>
		<description>Maybe all Republicans should have to go to re-education camps to come into line with the new thinking!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe all Republicans should have to go to re-education camps to come into line with the new thinking!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DF</title>
		<link>http://politics.ohio.com/2008/11/09/judicial-restraint/comment-page-1/#comment-6804</link>
		<dc:creator>DF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 18:40:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politics.ohio.com/?p=3339#comment-6804</guid>
		<description>Rev...Being Conservative is not &quot;fanatical&quot;.  I never said we need to build concentration camps (like FDR did when he imprisoned many Japanese American citizens during World War II).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rev&#8230;Being Conservative is not &#034;fanatical&#034;.  I never said we need to build concentration camps (like FDR did when he imprisoned many Japanese American citizens during World War II).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Reverend</title>
		<link>http://politics.ohio.com/2008/11/09/judicial-restraint/comment-page-1/#comment-6800</link>
		<dc:creator>The Reverend</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 13:35:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politics.ohio.com/?p=3339#comment-6800</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s keep in mind that Bush got what he wanted. Roberts and Alito. Bush, according to my reading, has also appointed a majority of federal judges now sitting. He appointed mostly younger judges so they could dominate the judicial scene for a long time. Roberts and Alito are both young.

The toughest job for Obama and the Dems will be dealing with a judicial system packed with advocates for the powerful. 

If and when an opening on the Supreme bench occurs....stonewalling by GOP&#039;ers will not be received well by voters. Not after such a big progressive win. 

DF&#039;s &quot;blue Republicans&quot; are what are called moderate Republicans. Is that what the GOP wants now? A completely fanatical party with no moderates at all?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#039;s keep in mind that Bush got what he wanted. Roberts and Alito. Bush, according to my reading, has also appointed a majority of federal judges now sitting. He appointed mostly younger judges so they could dominate the judicial scene for a long time. Roberts and Alito are both young.</p>
<p>The toughest job for Obama and the Dems will be dealing with a judicial system packed with advocates for the powerful. </p>
<p>If and when an opening on the Supreme bench occurs&#8230;.stonewalling by GOP&#039;ers will not be received well by voters. Not after such a big progressive win. </p>
<p>DF&#039;s &#034;blue Republicans&#034; are what are called moderate Republicans. Is that what the GOP wants now? A completely fanatical party with no moderates at all?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DF</title>
		<link>http://politics.ohio.com/2008/11/09/judicial-restraint/comment-page-1/#comment-6796</link>
		<dc:creator>DF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 00:06:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politics.ohio.com/?p=3339#comment-6796</guid>
		<description>Ben,

That is why we need to target those Blue-Republicans and get them the hell out of there.

I am with you on everything you have said so far.  

Keep the blog alive and keep fighting the good fight.

DF</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ben,</p>
<p>That is why we need to target those Blue-Republicans and get them the hell out of there.</p>
<p>I am with you on everything you have said so far.  </p>
<p>Keep the blog alive and keep fighting the good fight.</p>
<p>DF</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frank</title>
		<link>http://politics.ohio.com/2008/11/09/judicial-restraint/comment-page-1/#comment-6794</link>
		<dc:creator>frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 23:15:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politics.ohio.com/?p=3339#comment-6794</guid>
		<description>they wont do anything except rollover and take it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>they wont do anything except rollover and take it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Keeler</title>
		<link>http://politics.ohio.com/2008/11/09/judicial-restraint/comment-page-1/#comment-6790</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Keeler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 20:12:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politics.ohio.com/?p=3339#comment-6790</guid>
		<description>what I mean at the end there is that Democrats would likely be able to block any Republican filibsuter if we arent committed to it.  People like Specter, Collins and Snowe could be easy pickings by Democrats.

That is why Democrats are too wrapped up in getting 60 votes - its just a symbolic number.  If you have 59 senators and one Republican who always votes for you, its just like having 60.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what I mean at the end there is that Democrats would likely be able to block any Republican filibsuter if we arent committed to it.  People like Specter, Collins and Snowe could be easy pickings by Democrats.</p>
<p>That is why Democrats are too wrapped up in getting 60 votes &#8211; its just a symbolic number.  If you have 59 senators and one Republican who always votes for you, its just like having 60.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.475 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2009-10-07 01:09:05 -->
