<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Friday Roundup: Seals, Polls, Schools, RINOs, and More</title>
	<atom:link href="http://politics.ohio.com/2008/06/27/friday-roundup-seals-polls-schools-rinos-and-more/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://politics.ohio.com/2008/06/27/friday-roundup-seals-polls-schools-rinos-and-more/</link>
	<description>Ohio Politcal News, Commentary and Information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 22:07:38 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Julie</title>
		<link>http://politics.ohio.com/2008/06/27/friday-roundup-seals-polls-schools-rinos-and-more/comment-page-1/#comment-3526</link>
		<dc:creator>Julie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 18:12:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politics.ohio.com/?p=397#comment-3526</guid>
		<description>what a pompous seal</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what a pompous seal</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anti-Obama blogs targeted in Blogspot account shutdowns &#124; Writes Like She Talks</title>
		<link>http://politics.ohio.com/2008/06/27/friday-roundup-seals-polls-schools-rinos-and-more/comment-page-1/#comment-3523</link>
		<dc:creator>Anti-Obama blogs targeted in Blogspot account shutdowns &#124; Writes Like She Talks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 15:39:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politics.ohio.com/?p=397#comment-3523</guid>
		<description>[...] (Chorus of how we have to reveal all the poseurs and lies please enter now.) This was the crux of a comment on left at The Point over the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (Chorus of how we have to reveal all the poseurs and lies please enter now.) This was the crux of a comment on left at The Point over the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bj</title>
		<link>http://politics.ohio.com/2008/06/27/friday-roundup-seals-polls-schools-rinos-and-more/comment-page-1/#comment-3520</link>
		<dc:creator>bj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 07:05:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politics.ohio.com/?p=397#comment-3520</guid>
		<description>Ben,

In the case of only teaching Spanish, I think that is as dumb as only teaching English.  

a.c.,

1. Of the 50 most widely spoken languages in the world, Spanish is 3rd with 332 million people (Mandarin Chinese is 1st and English is 2nd).  While it would make a lot of sense to have students learn Chinese as a second language, as far as practical application goes someone in the U.S. would likely have more opportunities to speak Spanish than they would Chinese.  Heck, if we had more interaction with Quebec, I&#039;d say French.    
2. Studies show that if you only know one language, your ability to learn a second one decreases dramatically by around 13, which is when most U.S. schools start their second language programs.  If however, you already know 2 languages by that time, learning a third or fourth langauge is that much easier.
3. Since when does only speaking Spanish = illegal?
4.  Many economists see Brazil (I know, they speak Portuguese) and the rest of Latin America as becoming the next &quot;China&quot; within the next 20 years, so yes it will help citizens become competitive.  
5. My comment about science had more to do with asking what skills will enable a U.S. citizen be competitive in in the future?  With the belief that the more skill sets a worker has the more likely he/she will be to find success in the workplace.  It will also help to hedge against changes in the job market.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ben,</p>
<p>In the case of only teaching Spanish, I think that is as dumb as only teaching English.  </p>
<p>a.c.,</p>
<p>1. Of the 50 most widely spoken languages in the world, Spanish is 3rd with 332 million people (Mandarin Chinese is 1st and English is 2nd).  While it would make a lot of sense to have students learn Chinese as a second language, as far as practical application goes someone in the U.S. would likely have more opportunities to speak Spanish than they would Chinese.  Heck, if we had more interaction with Quebec, I&#039;d say French.<br />
2. Studies show that if you only know one language, your ability to learn a second one decreases dramatically by around 13, which is when most U.S. schools start their second language programs.  If however, you already know 2 languages by that time, learning a third or fourth langauge is that much easier.<br />
3. Since when does only speaking Spanish = illegal?<br />
4.  Many economists see Brazil (I know, they speak Portuguese) and the rest of Latin America as becoming the next &#034;China&#034; within the next 20 years, so yes it will help citizens become competitive.<br />
5. My comment about science had more to do with asking what skills will enable a U.S. citizen be competitive in in the future?  With the belief that the more skill sets a worker has the more likely he/she will be to find success in the workplace.  It will also help to hedge against changes in the job market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jill</title>
		<link>http://politics.ohio.com/2008/06/27/friday-roundup-seals-polls-schools-rinos-and-more/comment-page-1/#comment-3519</link>
		<dc:creator>Jill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 01:03:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politics.ohio.com/?p=397#comment-3519</guid>
		<description>I see some of it in the end of your comment, Ben but the way Lisa Renee hit it was more what I was thinking about (that was a good answer Lisa Renee! I hope the McCain people in Ohio read this if they want free good advice).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see some of it in the end of your comment, Ben but the way Lisa Renee hit it was more what I was thinking about (that was a good answer Lisa Renee! I hope the McCain people in Ohio read this if they want free good advice).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: angry conserv</title>
		<link>http://politics.ohio.com/2008/06/27/friday-roundup-seals-polls-schools-rinos-and-more/comment-page-1/#comment-3518</link>
		<dc:creator>angry conserv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 00:57:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politics.ohio.com/?p=397#comment-3518</guid>
		<description>1. students learning two languages in school and that language having to be Spanish.  Why Spanish?  
1. spanish is not the the primary language of tourists to this country
2. why should you expect one to accomodate someone here illegally by learning their language.
3. if you are attempting to create a more competitive citizen spanish is neither the scientific language nor the future improtant language in the global economy.
If your argument is the melting pot concept is out of date and the the new goal is the Balkanization of America then I would support your spanish rant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. students learning two languages in school and that language having to be Spanish.  Why Spanish?<br />
1. spanish is not the the primary language of tourists to this country<br />
2. why should you expect one to accomodate someone here illegally by learning their language.<br />
3. if you are attempting to create a more competitive citizen spanish is neither the scientific language nor the future improtant language in the global economy.<br />
If your argument is the melting pot concept is out of date and the the new goal is the Balkanization of America then I would support your spanish rant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frank</title>
		<link>http://politics.ohio.com/2008/06/27/friday-roundup-seals-polls-schools-rinos-and-more/comment-page-1/#comment-3514</link>
		<dc:creator>frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 19:54:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politics.ohio.com/?p=397#comment-3514</guid>
		<description>obama up a few.  nothing that is concrete</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>obama up a few.  nothing that is concrete</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LisaRenee</title>
		<link>http://politics.ohio.com/2008/06/27/friday-roundup-seals-polls-schools-rinos-and-more/comment-page-1/#comment-3513</link>
		<dc:creator>LisaRenee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 17:44:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politics.ohio.com/?p=397#comment-3513</guid>
		<description>How do you sell McCain?  You focus on what he offers that Obama does not, which is why the experience factor is going to be focused on.  Most of those who don&#039;t support Obama point to the lack of his record of achievement, his inability to stick to a position and his lack of experience.  

You point to the fact that McCain will stand alone if necessary and use things like the recent FISA vote to show that Obama will fold.  The flip flopper title worked to hurt Kerry and no matter how Obama&#039;s changes in position are justified, they will be used to show that he doesn&#039;t not keep his word.

Ironically, most of us are realistic enough to realize most electeds and candidates are less than honest, however we all want to pretend they are telling us the truth.  By Obama focusing on how he was going to be different, he actually created a larger area for credibility attacks that I believe have more potential than trying to paint McCain as the third Bush term.  People don&#039;t know Obama, they know McCain.  What Obama is going to need to do to win, would be different...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do you sell McCain?  You focus on what he offers that Obama does not, which is why the experience factor is going to be focused on.  Most of those who don&#039;t support Obama point to the lack of his record of achievement, his inability to stick to a position and his lack of experience.  </p>
<p>You point to the fact that McCain will stand alone if necessary and use things like the recent FISA vote to show that Obama will fold.  The flip flopper title worked to hurt Kerry and no matter how Obama&#039;s changes in position are justified, they will be used to show that he doesn&#039;t not keep his word.</p>
<p>Ironically, most of us are realistic enough to realize most electeds and candidates are less than honest, however we all want to pretend they are telling us the truth.  By Obama focusing on how he was going to be different, he actually created a larger area for credibility attacks that I believe have more potential than trying to paint McCain as the third Bush term.  People don&#039;t know Obama, they know McCain.  What Obama is going to need to do to win, would be different&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Keeler</title>
		<link>http://politics.ohio.com/2008/06/27/friday-roundup-seals-polls-schools-rinos-and-more/comment-page-1/#comment-3512</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Keeler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 06:20:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politics.ohio.com/?p=397#comment-3512</guid>
		<description>This debate isnt about second languages.  This is about a school in North Carolina going to solely Spanish, not just including it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This debate isnt about second languages.  This is about a school in North Carolina going to solely Spanish, not just including it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bj</title>
		<link>http://politics.ohio.com/2008/06/27/friday-roundup-seals-polls-schools-rinos-and-more/comment-page-1/#comment-3511</link>
		<dc:creator>bj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 02:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politics.ohio.com/?p=397#comment-3511</guid>
		<description>I am all for duel language schools.  Students in Europe are spending half of their school day being taught in the &quot;home&quot; countries language and the other half being taught in a &quot;foreign&quot; language.  Students in Asia are learning Korean, Japanese, Chinese and English in their elementary (or younger) schools.  How is opening up the minds and communication abiliites of students a bad thing?  The U.S. has all but stopped putting scientists and engineers into the workplace.  In a global economy who is going to have a better shot at getting a job, someone who can speak only English, or someone who can communicate in 2 or 3 or more different languages?

With current demographic trends it only makes sense to teach Spanish as a second language, as you are more likely to run into someone legal, illegal or tourist who is a Spanish speaker.  Also, the earlier you immplement a second language, the easier it is for a student to learn, thereby causing less frustration.

Wasn&#039;t it the Republican controled government that had a record number of pork projects?  Seems like kind of a silly statement to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am all for duel language schools.  Students in Europe are spending half of their school day being taught in the &#034;home&#034; countries language and the other half being taught in a &#034;foreign&#034; language.  Students in Asia are learning Korean, Japanese, Chinese and English in their elementary (or younger) schools.  How is opening up the minds and communication abiliites of students a bad thing?  The U.S. has all but stopped putting scientists and engineers into the workplace.  In a global economy who is going to have a better shot at getting a job, someone who can speak only English, or someone who can communicate in 2 or 3 or more different languages?</p>
<p>With current demographic trends it only makes sense to teach Spanish as a second language, as you are more likely to run into someone legal, illegal or tourist who is a Spanish speaker.  Also, the earlier you immplement a second language, the easier it is for a student to learn, thereby causing less frustration.</p>
<p>Wasn&#039;t it the Republican controled government that had a record number of pork projects?  Seems like kind of a silly statement to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BBT</title>
		<link>http://politics.ohio.com/2008/06/27/friday-roundup-seals-polls-schools-rinos-and-more/comment-page-1/#comment-3510</link>
		<dc:creator>BBT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 20:47:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politics.ohio.com/?p=397#comment-3510</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately, McCain seems to be of the opinion that he can constantly give conservatives “the finger” while pandering to every other group imaginable because Obama is so bad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately, McCain seems to be of the opinion that he can constantly give conservatives “the finger” while pandering to every other group imaginable because Obama is so bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://politics.ohio.com/2008/06/27/friday-roundup-seals-polls-schools-rinos-and-more/comment-page-1/#comment-3509</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 20:15:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politics.ohio.com/?p=397#comment-3509</guid>
		<description>daily tracking polls are showing a much closer race</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>daily tracking polls are showing a much closer race</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Keeler</title>
		<link>http://politics.ohio.com/2008/06/27/friday-roundup-seals-polls-schools-rinos-and-more/comment-page-1/#comment-3507</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Keeler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 18:47:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politics.ohio.com/?p=397#comment-3507</guid>
		<description>Jill, I think that is how I answered the question.  I compared the two and I think McCain is on the right side of issues.  Thats how I would sell him.

But Larry, you are right, that does seem to be his plan.  He will need more to win the election than that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jill, I think that is how I answered the question.  I compared the two and I think McCain is on the right side of issues.  Thats how I would sell him.</p>
<p>But Larry, you are right, that does seem to be his plan.  He will need more to win the election than that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jill</title>
		<link>http://politics.ohio.com/2008/06/27/friday-roundup-seals-polls-schools-rinos-and-more/comment-page-1/#comment-3506</link>
		<dc:creator>Jill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 22:08:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politics.ohio.com/?p=397#comment-3506</guid>
		<description>Wow - that&#039;s fun, Larry - that we agree. :)

Seriously though - I know it might seem antiquated or even quaint, but I don&#039;t know how we can expect to get better leaders if we don&#039;t expect more from them, and from each other as voters.  And yes, I really do wake up each day thinking that and wanting that - no matter what is on the cover of the papers. Or the blogs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow &#8211; that&#039;s fun, Larry &#8211; that we agree. <img src='http://politics.ohio.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Seriously though &#8211; I know it might seem antiquated or even quaint, but I don&#039;t know how we can expect to get better leaders if we don&#039;t expect more from them, and from each other as voters.  And yes, I really do wake up each day thinking that and wanting that &#8211; no matter what is on the cover of the papers. Or the blogs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: larry d.</title>
		<link>http://politics.ohio.com/2008/06/27/friday-roundup-seals-polls-schools-rinos-and-more/comment-page-1/#comment-3505</link>
		<dc:creator>larry d.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 21:34:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politics.ohio.com/?p=397#comment-3505</guid>
		<description>I agree with Jill. McCain&#039;s betting Obama will scare enough people to vote Republican and Obama&#039;s betting enough people will vote against &#039;another four years of George Bush.&#039; It&#039;s depressing.

Obama has a taste for propaganda and if he keeps it up with the weird iconology, McCain might have a chance. McCain needs to start hammering Obama on drilling, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Jill. McCain&#039;s betting Obama will scare enough people to vote Republican and Obama&#039;s betting enough people will vote against &#039;another four years of George Bush.&#039; It&#039;s depressing.</p>
<p>Obama has a taste for propaganda and if he keeps it up with the weird iconology, McCain might have a chance. McCain needs to start hammering Obama on drilling, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jill</title>
		<link>http://politics.ohio.com/2008/06/27/friday-roundup-seals-polls-schools-rinos-and-more/comment-page-1/#comment-3503</link>
		<dc:creator>Jill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 21:01:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politics.ohio.com/?p=397#comment-3503</guid>
		<description>Okay, Ben - I suspected after I wrote that you might write what you first did - I really wanted to focus more on: how do you sell McCain? How do you sell Republicans of voting for him, not on scaring them off from Obama and Democrats?

I&#039;m saying in a Utopian world, where Democrats too would focus on selling their candidate as opposed to scaring them off of McCain.

What would you do?

The reason I put it this way is because it&#039;s how I view candidates when I&#039;m trying to choose and frankly, it&#039;s why I so rarely find anyone I like - because I don&#039;t go to vote so I can vote against something else.  I feel strongly that we need to re-indoctrinate ourselves to expect the MOST from candidates, not simply expect that we can point out enough flaws in someone else in order to win.

Do you know what I mean?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, Ben &#8211; I suspected after I wrote that you might write what you first did &#8211; I really wanted to focus more on: how do you sell McCain? How do you sell Republicans of voting for him, not on scaring them off from Obama and Democrats?</p>
<p>I&#039;m saying in a Utopian world, where Democrats too would focus on selling their candidate as opposed to scaring them off of McCain.</p>
<p>What would you do?</p>
<p>The reason I put it this way is because it&#039;s how I view candidates when I&#039;m trying to choose and frankly, it&#039;s why I so rarely find anyone I like &#8211; because I don&#039;t go to vote so I can vote against something else.  I feel strongly that we need to re-indoctrinate ourselves to expect the MOST from candidates, not simply expect that we can point out enough flaws in someone else in order to win.</p>
<p>Do you know what I mean?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: angry conserv</title>
		<link>http://politics.ohio.com/2008/06/27/friday-roundup-seals-polls-schools-rinos-and-more/comment-page-1/#comment-3502</link>
		<dc:creator>angry conserv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 20:58:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politics.ohio.com/?p=397#comment-3502</guid>
		<description>I realize the goal is to embrace diversity and make everyones life easier by accomodating the Hispanics when ever possible.  We are headed towards a bi-lingual country and one that encourages the Hispnaic&#039;s to reatain their culture.  What about all the other immigrants?  Are we not discriminating against them by not offering the same level of support and comfort as their Hispanic brothers and sisters.  I am surprised the well intentioned liberals as well as the Hispanics have not been more proactive in screaming racism and discrimination towards their oppressed brothers and sisters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I realize the goal is to embrace diversity and make everyones life easier by accomodating the Hispanics when ever possible.  We are headed towards a bi-lingual country and one that encourages the Hispnaic&#039;s to reatain their culture.  What about all the other immigrants?  Are we not discriminating against them by not offering the same level of support and comfort as their Hispanic brothers and sisters.  I am surprised the well intentioned liberals as well as the Hispanics have not been more proactive in screaming racism and discrimination towards their oppressed brothers and sisters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Keeler</title>
		<link>http://politics.ohio.com/2008/06/27/friday-roundup-seals-polls-schools-rinos-and-more/comment-page-1/#comment-3501</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Keeler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 20:22:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politics.ohio.com/?p=397#comment-3501</guid>
		<description>First off, I dont agree with the &quot;wedge issue&quot; premise.  Democrats and liberals tend to use the term wedge issue for anything that is social and may not work to their advantage.  If they think Republicans have an advantage, it is a wedge issue.  Some people care about those issues.  A lot.  Anyways.

we are obviously running uphill, but the argument has to be made (correctly in my eyes) that Obama does not have enough expierence and that he is like any other politican, which he is.  I think his economic plan would wreck the country, and some of that is built into the markets right now.  He has no real plan to increase our oil supply.  That is a big issue for voters...I wouldnt consider the Supreme court a wedge issue.  GOP voters care about that.  The argument can be made that an Obama win puts both houses of Congress + White House in Democratic hands.  McCain is against govt pork - so are a lot of average people.  Obama is for it.  McCain wants to secure the border (he says now).  And lastly, he doesnt want a quick pullout of Iraq troops and see the success of the surge disappear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First off, I dont agree with the &#034;wedge issue&#034; premise.  Democrats and liberals tend to use the term wedge issue for anything that is social and may not work to their advantage.  If they think Republicans have an advantage, it is a wedge issue.  Some people care about those issues.  A lot.  Anyways.</p>
<p>we are obviously running uphill, but the argument has to be made (correctly in my eyes) that Obama does not have enough expierence and that he is like any other politican, which he is.  I think his economic plan would wreck the country, and some of that is built into the markets right now.  He has no real plan to increase our oil supply.  That is a big issue for voters&#8230;I wouldnt consider the Supreme court a wedge issue.  GOP voters care about that.  The argument can be made that an Obama win puts both houses of Congress + White House in Democratic hands.  McCain is against govt pork &#8211; so are a lot of average people.  Obama is for it.  McCain wants to secure the border (he says now).  And lastly, he doesnt want a quick pullout of Iraq troops and see the success of the surge disappear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jill</title>
		<link>http://politics.ohio.com/2008/06/27/friday-roundup-seals-polls-schools-rinos-and-more/comment-page-1/#comment-3500</link>
		<dc:creator>Jill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 20:07:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politics.ohio.com/?p=397#comment-3500</guid>
		<description>Ben - serious question for you: if being in charge and having all the influence anyone might need were no object, what would you do, what plan would you implement, to invigorate usual conservative and/or Republican voters?  I wanted to say that you have to exclude using wedge issues like scaring people about abortion or illegal immigration etc., but I suppose if that&#039;s all you&#039;ve got...still, what I&#039;d really like to see is what you do think you have - without those issues - that could convince and persuade non-Democrats to vote and vote for a GOP candidate this year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ben &#8211; serious question for you: if being in charge and having all the influence anyone might need were no object, what would you do, what plan would you implement, to invigorate usual conservative and/or Republican voters?  I wanted to say that you have to exclude using wedge issues like scaring people about abortion or illegal immigration etc., but I suppose if that&#039;s all you&#039;ve got&#8230;still, what I&#039;d really like to see is what you do think you have &#8211; without those issues &#8211; that could convince and persuade non-Democrats to vote and vote for a GOP candidate this year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.817 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2009-10-07 05:12:14 -->
