<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thanks For Your Service</title>
	<atom:link href="http://politics.ohio.com/2008/06/23/thanks-for-your-service/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://politics.ohio.com/2008/06/23/thanks-for-your-service/</link>
	<description>Ohio Politcal News, Commentary and Information</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 06:13:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: BizzyBlog &#187; Things I&#8217;d Like to Post About Today &#8230;.. (062508, Morning)</title>
		<link>http://politics.ohio.com/2008/06/23/thanks-for-your-service/#comment-3479</link>
		<dc:creator>BizzyBlog &#187; Things I&#8217;d Like to Post About Today &#8230;.. (062508, Morning)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 12:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politics.ohio.com/?p=389#comment-3479</guid>
		<description>[...] children at the New York Times outed a CIA interrogator (accordingly, no linky-dink for them; HT The Point via NixGuy) for no other defensible reason besides the fact that they could. What will they do if [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] children at the New York Times outed a CIA interrogator (accordingly, no linky-dink for them; HT The Point via NixGuy) for no other defensible reason besides the fact that they could. What will they do if [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Reverend</title>
		<link>http://politics.ohio.com/2008/06/23/thanks-for-your-service/#comment-3460</link>
		<dc:creator>The Reverend</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 13:37:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politics.ohio.com/?p=389#comment-3460</guid>
		<description>The NYT was, at the very least, complicit in Bush's re-election in 2004. If the paper would have broken the spying-on-Americans story before the election, we might be out of Iraq now. Instead more U.S. soldiers are dead. For nothing.

Side note to Ben: McCain did have a cozy relationship with Vicky Iseman. The NYT reported the truth. Nowhere did the Times say McCain was screwing Iseman. But indeed, she had McSame's ear, and apparently his letter writing ability on behalf of client: Paxson Communications.

Second note:"...saying that to identify [not using name here] would invade his privacy and put him at risk of retaliation from terrorists or harassment from critics of the agency."

You have to admit, this CIA request is kind of laughable considering the open illegal spying and Constitutional violations of the present White House.

And finally: Fearmongering is....umm....out of season.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The NYT was, at the very least, complicit in Bush&#039;s re-election in 2004. If the paper would have broken the spying-on-Americans story before the election, we might be out of Iraq now. Instead more U.S. soldiers are dead. For nothing.</p>
<p>Side note to Ben: McCain did have a cozy relationship with Vicky Iseman. The NYT reported the truth. Nowhere did the Times say McCain was screwing Iseman. But indeed, she had McSame&#039;s ear, and apparently his letter writing ability on behalf of client: Paxson Communications.</p>
<p>Second note:&#034;&#8230;saying that to identify [not using name here] would invade his privacy and put him at risk of retaliation from terrorists or harassment from critics of the agency.&#034;</p>
<p>You have to admit, this CIA request is kind of laughable considering the open illegal spying and Constitutional violations of the present White House.</p>
<p>And finally: Fearmongering is&#8230;.umm&#8230;.out of season.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonymous</title>
		<link>http://politics.ohio.com/2008/06/23/thanks-for-your-service/#comment-3444</link>
		<dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 17:15:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politics.ohio.com/?p=389#comment-3444</guid>
		<description>Chuck K
Your comment about thanking the NYT for 4 more years of AMerican bloodshed in Iraq is way out of line, even for you.
 
Yes, they did have the right to run this story.  That is not the point--it was should they have run the story including the name and the details of his present life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chuck K<br />
Your comment about thanking the NYT for 4 more years of AMerican bloodshed in Iraq is way out of line, even for you.</p>
<p>Yes, they did have the right to run this story.  That is not the point&#8211;it was should they have run the story including the name and the details of his present life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Keeler</title>
		<link>http://politics.ohio.com/2008/06/23/thanks-for-your-service/#comment-3443</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Keeler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 17:15:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politics.ohio.com/?p=389#comment-3443</guid>
		<description>Chuck K, I never said they couldn't run it - I said they shouldn't run it.

Speaking of wiretapping, you must be disapointed with Obama's latest backtrack as he tries to go the center?

Obama spokesman Bill Burton on October 24, 2007: “To be clear: Barack will support a filibuster of any bill that includes retroactive immunity for telecommunications companies.”

Barack Obama, June 20, 2008: “Given the legitimate threats we face, providing effective intelligence collection tools with appropriate safeguards is too important to delay. So I support the compromise, but do so with a firm pledge that as president, I will carefully monitor the program.”</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chuck K, I never said they couldn&#039;t run it - I said they shouldn&#039;t run it.</p>
<p>Speaking of wiretapping, you must be disapointed with Obama&#039;s latest backtrack as he tries to go the center?</p>
<p>Obama spokesman Bill Burton on October 24, 2007: “To be clear: Barack will support a filibuster of any bill that includes retroactive immunity for telecommunications companies.”</p>
<p>Barack Obama, June 20, 2008: “Given the legitimate threats we face, providing effective intelligence collection tools with appropriate safeguards is too important to delay. So I support the compromise, but do so with a firm pledge that as president, I will carefully monitor the program.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck K</title>
		<link>http://politics.ohio.com/2008/06/23/thanks-for-your-service/#comment-3442</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 16:50:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politics.ohio.com/?p=389#comment-3442</guid>
		<description>Meanwhile, the Bush administration, as individual have no right to dessiminate such things, unlike the press. 


And this is another "how dare you moment" 

That same press you guys bitch about kept back the warrantless wiretapping story until AFTER the 2004 election.  That could have swung the election, but they sat on it to aid these Bush goons.  

You should thank the NYT every day that Bush was reelected, so you could see 4 more years of tax cuts and american blood in iraq.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Meanwhile, the Bush administration, as individual have no right to dessiminate such things, unlike the press. </p>
<p>And this is another &#034;how dare you moment&#034; </p>
<p>That same press you guys bitch about kept back the warrantless wiretapping story until AFTER the 2004 election.  That could have swung the election, but they sat on it to aid these Bush goons.  </p>
<p>You should thank the NYT every day that Bush was reelected, so you could see 4 more years of tax cuts and american blood in iraq.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck K</title>
		<link>http://politics.ohio.com/2008/06/23/thanks-for-your-service/#comment-3441</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 16:40:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politics.ohio.com/?p=389#comment-3441</guid>
		<description>They have every right to run such a story.  

and the claim that they are anti-america for doing so shows how flawed your views of what being american represents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They have every right to run such a story.  </p>
<p>and the claim that they are anti-america for doing so shows how flawed your views of what being american represents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Keeler</title>
		<link>http://politics.ohio.com/2008/06/23/thanks-for-your-service/#comment-3433</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Keeler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 22:11:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politics.ohio.com/?p=389#comment-3433</guid>
		<description>For sure I think they are more interested in their agenda than anything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For sure I think they are more interested in their agenda than anything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DA</title>
		<link>http://politics.ohio.com/2008/06/23/thanks-for-your-service/#comment-3431</link>
		<dc:creator>DA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 21:07:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politics.ohio.com/?p=389#comment-3431</guid>
		<description>traitors</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>traitors</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julie</title>
		<link>http://politics.ohio.com/2008/06/23/thanks-for-your-service/#comment-3429</link>
		<dc:creator>Julie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 19:14:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politics.ohio.com/?p=389#comment-3429</guid>
		<description>This is disgraceful behavior and has nothing to do with the other CIA case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is disgraceful behavior and has nothing to do with the other CIA case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: angry conservative</title>
		<link>http://politics.ohio.com/2008/06/23/thanks-for-your-service/#comment-3428</link>
		<dc:creator>angry conservative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 18:41:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politics.ohio.com/?p=389#comment-3428</guid>
		<description>Hey, we are talking the NYT here.  They only interest is futhering their agenda.  They will never let facts, agreements or any other thing get in their way. I used to regularly read the NYT times now I occasionaly read the rag for its humor content.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, we are talking the NYT here.  They only interest is futhering their agenda.  They will never let facts, agreements or any other thing get in their way. I used to regularly read the NYT times now I occasionaly read the rag for its humor content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonymous</title>
		<link>http://politics.ohio.com/2008/06/23/thanks-for-your-service/#comment-3426</link>
		<dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 14:46:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politics.ohio.com/?p=389#comment-3426</guid>
		<description>Did they give the man's home phone number, address and email too?  
I guess getting the name in print is more important to the essence of the story than protecting people with valuable skills and who have broken no laws. But when you are the NYT I guess you can justify anything.
Yes, I don't think made any front page apologies for linking McCain and the lobbyist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did they give the man&#039;s home phone number, address and email too?<br />
I guess getting the name in print is more important to the essence of the story than protecting people with valuable skills and who have broken no laws. But when you are the NYT I guess you can justify anything.<br />
Yes, I don&#039;t think made any front page apologies for linking McCain and the lobbyist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NixGuy.com &#187; Selective Outrage</title>
		<link>http://politics.ohio.com/2008/06/23/thanks-for-your-service/#comment-3425</link>
		<dc:creator>NixGuy.com &#187; Selective Outrage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 12:07:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politics.ohio.com/?p=389#comment-3425</guid>
		<description>[...] hits the real point of the NYT leaking of the KSM interrogator:  Some Democrats will be quick to point [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] hits the real point of the NYT leaking of the KSM interrogator:  Some Democrats will be quick to point [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
