Comments on: Obama's Point Man for VP Selection

By: Jim

Jim — Thu, 24 Jul 2008 12:34:46 +0000

OBAMA/BAYH

By: Joe M

Joe M — Mon, 09 Jun 2008 21:56:16 +0000

Only rich people and those that live in places Obama likes should be able to decide who is president.

By: Alex H

Alex H — Mon, 09 Jun 2008 17:01:12 +0000

LisRenee, that is the only reason that O'bama would take Richardson. To try and get some of the Hispanic vote.

By: mark

mark — Mon, 09 Jun 2008 16:11:12 +0000

anybody got any info on McCain's campaign mgr. having been Achmed Chalaby's D.C. introduction escort BEFORE Bush went to war ?

By: LisaRenee

LisaRenee — Mon, 09 Jun 2008 05:14:12 +0000

Richardson would be a better pick than some of the names mentioned, it was fairly clear when Richardson made the decision to endorse Obama that he was interested.

Personally he would have been my second presidential choice after Edwards.

That said, I'm not sure how much he would help with the electability factor beyond helping to get some of the hispanic vote. Which while needed still doesn't attract some of the moderate base that were Clinton supporters. Richardson's decision to not endorse Clinton caused some minor feelings of bitterness.

By: Ben Keeler

Ben Keeler — Sun, 08 Jun 2008 23:27:23 +0000

No I didnt. I have never said I want the popular vote to replace the Electoral College.

By: Jon F

Jon F — Sun, 08 Jun 2008 23:17:26 +0000

You mentioned in the previous article that the popular vote should be enacted for electing a president. I disagree.
This would ensure massive voter fraud in our big cities.
Also, massive efforts would be made in cities like NYC and LA
to bus people to the polls. This would hurt republicans.

By: Gary Lewis

Gary Lewis — Sun, 08 Jun 2008 21:19:36 +0000

Reverend:

I hope you went to church today and prayed that God heals you of your delusion.

A multiple felon who obstructed justice in a conspiracy to out a covert CIA agent? It must have took you all morning to think of that pile of crap.

I know you people on the left have no morals, so I probably shouldn't even bring it up, but Holder could have advised the child molester Clinton that pardoning Rich was not a good idea. But, he's a Kool-Aid drinker just like you, so I'm not surprised.

By: The Reverend

The Reverend — Sun, 08 Jun 2008 20:44:38 +0000

"one of the most infamous events"

That provoked a laugh out of ole Reverend.

So did Holder grant the pardon of Rich? Or did he simply write up papers? Clinton pardoned Rich, Clinton carries that weight.

And though I don't like using moral equivalency responses, and this certainly isn't one in my mind……you have a GOP candidate who still supports the foreign policy and economic programs of an administration that commuted a multiple felon who obstructed justice in a conspiracy to out a covert CIA agent, all in a time of war.

And Rich did what again? That's right, not much.

I sympathize with ya' though. Not much you can get a foothold with in seeking to hurt Obama.

He's an exceptional candidate.

By: larry d.

larry d. — Sun, 08 Jun 2008 12:02:30 +0000

Richardson's experience in the area's of terrorist sympathizing and racial charlatanism is very weak. He is also unproven as far as union thuggery goes.

By: tom billmeyer

tom billmeyer — Sun, 08 Jun 2008 08:14:53 +0000

I've voting for him but this was flat out not smart.

By: angry conserv

angry conserv — Sun, 08 Jun 2008 07:52:38 +0000

The press sprays a new coating of teflon on him every day and downplays his associations and contradictory statements as old style(Rep) politics. I couldnt believe the 2 statements seperated by only 12 hours he made concerning concerning Jerusalem. The mainstream press decides what is news and apparently that wasnt