Poll

Should there be a recall on Akron mayor Don Plusquellic?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...



Ohio Blogger Headlines

Information Center

Voter's guide

Voting Issues

Primary and caucus tracker

State information sites

State political sites

Ohio's daily newspapers

Exclusive content

Candidate Profiles

Democratic Party Republican Party Independents mapcut.jpg See how Ohio has voted in the past 23 presidential elections

View Chip Bok's political cartoons


AP's Daily Campaign Minute


Blogroll




CNN Working Towards Ohio Primary Debates

UPDATE: Kyle and I will be on the Ray Horner Show on 1590 WAKR tomorrow to discuss The Point, Ohio Politics, Super Tuesday, and whatever else we are asked about. We are scheduled to be on from 8 to 8:45 AM.

Ben's Header
But will they still matter or be needed?

ABJ: CNN has been negotiating with both state political parties all week to bring presidential debates to Cleveland or Columbus on Feb. 27 and 28. Ohio Democratic Party Chairman Chris Redfern said his party's candidates will debate Wednesday, Feb. 27. Kevin DeWine, Ohio Republican Party co-chairman, said Republicans will debate Thursday, Feb. 28. The city and venue of both debates (likely to be held in the same location) has not yet been determined. E.J. Thomas Hall, anyone?

For once, I think I might agree with the ODP Chairman who says that Ohio will decide the Democratic nomination (don't look for me to repeat that I agree with Redfern for the duration of the campaign). No matter what happens on Tuesday, that race won't be over. Many political talkers are now saying it looks March 4 could be the day where one candidate is put over the top delegate wise (along with Ohio, Texas, Rhode Island, and Vermont vote). Neither Clinton or Obama is going to call it quits anytime soon, and when you look at the calendar, there aren't many big prizes between Tuesday and our primary day. A split verdict Tuesday means the Democratic race is going to be extended for the foreseeable future and you can expect the local airwaves to be plastered with political ads.

On the Republican side, this might not be the case, as McCain is looking to be in solid position with a comfortable national lead. If it did get to the point where Ohio was a major factor on the Republican side, Romney can take comfort in the fact that he took in more money in our state during 2007 than any candidate in either party. If McCain doesn't clinch sometime in the next month then he has a problem as the frontrunner yet again - just having the debate means he is in trouble and lost his stranglehold on the nomination. If Romney drops out before February 28, there wouldn't really be a reason to have McCain debating other candidates if any are left. No reason he would do it either.

Bottom line, these debates are good for Ohio for the attention paid to the state by the candidates (even if they are on CNN). I sometimes wonder who would watch these things and actually not have their mind made up yet, but I guess some people don't write political blogs and watch cable news in their spare time. Better a debate here than somewhere else. By all accounts, CWRU did a fantastic job when they hosted the 2004 Veep Debate - the one where Cheney smacked around Edwards - so it is good to see Ohio get another such opportunity.

Note: Kyle and I will be liveblogging the Super Tuesday action. The thread will go up at around 5 on Tuesday and we will stick with it until the end of the night…West Coast states included. Now that is some dedication.



9 Responses for "CNN Working Towards Ohio Primary Debates"

  1. Kyle Kutuchief February 4th, 2008 at 8:21 am

    EJ would be a perfect venue. I suspect it will be held in Columbus to shorten the drive time of the people helping to pull it together (Redfern & Dewine).

  2. Joe M February 4th, 2008 at 12:16 pm

    Lisbon, Ohio should host
    Home of Ted Strickland

  3. fred February 4th, 2008 at 1:25 pm

    Will Mike Gravel be there?

  4. angry conserv February 4th, 2008 at 4:10 pm

    Despite the mainstream press coronation of McCain Ohio may become a pivotal state. If Romney can win California the game is on.

  5. Ben Keeler February 4th, 2008 at 4:46 pm

    Its gonna be tough for Romney. He is going to need to do more than win CA. Like I said, if McCain allows it to get to the point where Ohio matters, then he is some serious trouble.

  6. Dave February 4th, 2008 at 9:15 pm

    I, like many on the right, have concerns regarding Sen. McCain's conservative credentials. I heard someone say this weekend on one of the Sunday programs (I think it was Mary Matalin) that got me thinking a little differently. She said that McCain may be a maverick but he, for the most part, has a solid conservative record. He's always been pro-life and a pork and a defecit hawk. He has done a mea culpa on the immigration reform thing and has pledged to veto any attempts to raise taxes.

    Don't get me wrong, I still plan on voting for Romney next month, but if McCain is the nominee, I think I'll be able to enthusiatically support him over Hillary or Obama. I'm a little nervous about the noise coming from the right about him even if he becomes the nominee.

  7. anne February 4th, 2008 at 11:22 pm

    A true conservative may not like McCain and may hold their nose to vote for him, but Considering any of the Democratic opponents, the choice should be easy. I think that's the way I'd go, if I was any kind of Republican.

  8. Alaskan Independent February 5th, 2008 at 3:52 am

    I heard an interview the other day on Alaska Public Radio where Mike Gravel claimed he had an off-chance of winning Alaska in the Democratic primary. As a former Alaskan, he might just have a decent chance. The thing, with Alaska, is that national politics take a backseat to state issues regarding mining, oil/gas taxes, pipelines of all sorts, and our God Holy dividend.

  9. will February 27th, 2008 at 11:43 pm

    If you want to see funny new Skits about Clinton , Obama And John McCain go to… ://youtube.com/user/skitzophrenicprod


Leave a comment


Advertisement